10-11-2008

Harper's post-Thanksgiving election looking like a turkey for Tories


Don Martin
Canwest News Service

Conservative leader and Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper Stephen Harper's majority dream appears to have died in Quebec. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)

TORONTO - He never technically panicked. But with the polls turning sour in the final week of this craziest of volatile campaigns, Stephen Harper's invocation of his rival as a potential prime minister was the closest this headstrong leader will ever get to a political anxiety attack.

This election was to be the Conservative vindication, a return to the golden age of majority control as a pan-Canadian party, strong in every region and all-powerful in Parliament. Any reference to Prime Minister Stephane Dion would only qualify as a lame joke.

But, unless every poll is wrong, that won't happen Tuesday. A minority government that forced an election to win big seems, as much as anyone can foreshadow a result amid so much poll fluctuation, poised to end up another minority government within 10 seats, give or take, of its 129-seat count at dissolution.

That would make this modest change a mighty expensive seat-swapping exercise given the $300-million-plus cost of this election.

But for a well-prepared campaign with a leader towering in credibility over his rivals, even a solid win will be an emotional loss if it doesn't give the Conservatives half the Commons seats and thus sufficient control to end the procedural dysfunctionality Harper claimed was handcuffing Canadian democracy.

The majority dream appears to have died in Quebec. With all other regions showing incremental gains or losses, the rebounding strength of the Bloc Quebecois put on ice Conservative hopes for a 20-seat gain.

For that, the Conservatives can only blame themselves.

After investing enormous personal and political capital into wooing Quebec, pushing through the mostly-symbolic notion of a Quebecois "nation" and making almost every decision through the prism of ensuring a positive impact on that province, Harper appears set to suffer severe suitor rejection en francais.

Incredibly, it seems a minuscule $45 million arts cut - a single percentage fraction of the total arts spending - was enough to undo 32 months of goodwill to that province.

Also cited for the reversal of Conservative fortunes was a tough-love youth sentencing provision, which would've allowed judges to impose adult sentences on 14-year-olds if the province agreed.

With Quebec now seemingly a writeoff for the Conservatives, the brass ring became southern Ontario, where the outcome is still in play.

Still, having election predictions swing between gains or loses for the Conservatives this late in the game is a major head-scratcher.

There really were no defining turning-against-Harper moments of this campaign, where the Conservative's modest platform promises were a prudent fit with bad times.

He was riding a war machine that was a steamroller of meticulous preparation and planning that should've flattened a hapless Liberal campaign running on borrowed funds and lacking even a campaign jet at election takeoff.

Before forcing the vote, his government had covered all the important bases. They invested heavily in ethnic outreach and apologized profusely to offended minorities.

They gave a dignified resolution to the native residential school tragedy. They delivered significant tax breaks to selective demographics with vote-getting potential and continued to roll out fat fiscal surpluses.

And then came the pinch-me-I'm-dreaming Liberal development for Stephen Harper. At the precise moment the economy started to tank, the Liberals announced they'd stand for re-election on a carbon tax platform, which Harper figured had everything but a trap door and a noose for that party's election chances.

Harper would've loved a referendum on the Liberal Green Shift, but no government could have anticipated how external factors would rewrite this election script so profoundly.

Ironically, the first signs hit just as the prime minister was visiting the Governor General to force the election a year ahead of his fixed date.

Word landed during his coffee chat that U.S. government-sponsored mortgage agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had been placed under the control of the U.S. Treasury.

Unfortunately, those sub-prime mortgage casualties were merely the distant sound of bad news waves hitting the outer breakers.

The campaign trail quickly paled by comparison as global bank bailouts were unleashed, the market crashed, the dollar collapsed and oil prices fell down a deep well.

Harper's don't-worry-be-happy approach couldn't last. He was forced to abandon his natural aloofness and invoke his mother's stock market misfortunes to prove he was not a cold political rock in a sea of public pain and confusion.

His government, which had planned to stick with a hands-off plan, scrambled Friday with a $25-billion mortgage prop-up for the banks and warn the country to brace for another year of economic sluggishness.

Even so, a simple question of voting for the best leader for a lousy economy should've given the Conservatives advantage enough to give them the majority.

But once again, the trivial stuff intervened, in a repeat of those tactical mistakes late in the 2004 and 2006 campaigns that sent voters scurrying back to the Liberals.

A culture of self-defeat seems to be embedded in the DNA of Stephen Harper, whose small misspeaks have big electoral ramifications.

He shouldn't have defined his arts funding reallocation as a cultural battle against snobbery and galas. His exuberant Conservative backroom straddled the lines of good taste several times and put the most unlikely phrase of "puffin poop" into the headlines.

He made callous-sounding references to the market crash as having decent "buy" potential in a scrum. And then Harper's crowning boo-boo - an unfortunate sneer at the hapless Dion as he stumbled with English incomprehension through out-takes of an interview this week, which suggested a hard heart still beats inside the cultivated sweater-vest image makeover.

There's no denying the Conservatives have delivered a steady, disciplined government that gave critics precious little ammunition to target them as driven by hard-right ideology.

But if the polls accurately foreshadow Tuesday's results, Quebec is a lost cause for Conservative gains, with only modest swings in Ontario, Newfoundland and British Columbia.

People sitting down for their family dinners this holiday weekend have the power to declare Stephen Harper a one-term wonder or render Stephane Dion a single-election loser.

In the end, this election will be a referendum on the character of the two contenders for prime minister and their ability to serve as the comforting, competent face of a government amid economic ruins.

Only one of those men will survive the post-Thanksgiving vote to fight another election. The other will become a turkey stuffing footnote to political history.

Peter says:

Let's face it - without the dressing (Dion), potatoes (Layton) and gravy (May), the turkey (Harper) would be an incomplete political feast. Unfortunately, we'll soon dine on turkey again if the polls are to be believed. A Di(j)on glazed ham would have made a welcome change, maybe next time.

In the meantime, let's see how this turkey deals with the Cadman and Mulroney-Schreiber scandals (along with many more, no doubt) during this economic meltdown, after the Cons get another minority gov't.

Jim says:

Ok, so Harper probably blew what should have been a slam dunk win. It's all good in Ottawa. They'll all kiss and make up, laugh at the poor fools who elected them at the cost of at least $300 million, and move on with running, or is it ruining, the country. It's getting so that an honest man (or woman) can say 'what's the use in voting?'. As for me, Troy majorities have never been good for Canada or Canadians. The ghost of Brian Mulroney still walks the halls of Parliament, he was an evil man.

Canadian Nationalist says:

No matter what happens, if Harper & the Conservatives win a majority (which is a slim chance now) or even a minority, Canada will quite simply cease to be the nation it was. Harper will ensure that Canada no longer retains it's sovereignty due to his plans to "integrate" and "harmonize" Canada with the US & the European Union. I know this isn't known to most Canadians, but Harper is meeting with the EU on October 17th to review the draft agreement opening Canada's resource & systems up by integrating Canada with the EU.

In the future, when our children ask when & why Canada stopped being it's own country, I hope everyone voting Conservative remembers why it happened.

Code of Conduct

Thank you for visiting our site. Here are some guidelines for posting comments to our blogs and articles. Should you have any questions, please contact us.

You may not post anything that:

  • Infringes or violates any copyright, trademark, service mark, patent, trade secret, confidentiality rights or other rights of any third party;
  • Is abusive, harmful, tortuous, or is racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
  • Is libelous, defamatory or invades any privacy or publicity rights of any third party;
  • Contains or promotes criminal activity;

Some things to keep in mind when posting:

  • Respect: respect the guidelines and Terms of Use for the site’s usage. Respect Global News, its employees, and fellow community members.
  • Personal attacks and flames will not be tolerated. Constructive criticisms are acceptable; however, general attacks on a person will not be tolerated.
  • Commercial postings/solicitations are not allowed. Commercial content as a direct or indirect attempt to solicit customers through a post will be removed.
  • If someone has posted copyrighted material or otherwise illegal material, please notify Global News so that it may be removed.

We moderate all comments, blogs and forums and reserve the right to pull any inappropriate submissions from the site at our discretion.

We advise that you review the site’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and by visiting the site and using its services you are agreeing to the sites User Agreements and Privacy Policy.

Key Candidates


Previous
Stephen Harper

Stephen Harper

Conservative Party

Stéphane Dion

Stéphane Dion

Liberal Party

Gilles Duceppe

Gilles Duceppe

Bloc Québécois

Jack Layton

Jack Layton

New Democratic Party

Elizabeth May

Elizabeth May

Green Party

Olivia Chow

Olivia Chow

New Democratic Party

Michael Ignatieff

Michael Ignatieff

Liberal Party

Mike Nagy

Mike Nagy

Green Party

Justin Trudeau

Justin Trudeau

Liberal Party

Peter MacKay

Peter MacKay

Conservative Party

Jim Flaherty

Jim Flaherty

Conservative Party

Michael Fortier

Michael Fortier

Conservative Party

Bob Rae

Bob Rae

Liberal Party

Martha Hall Findlay

Martha Hall Findlay

Liberal Party

Thomas Mulcair

Thomas Mulcair

New Democratic Party

Peter Van Loan

Peter Van Loan

Conservative Party

Marc Garneau

Marc Garneau

Liberal Party

John Baird

John Baird

Conservative Party

Stockwell Day

Stockwell Day

Conservative Party

 
Next